In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Some people suppose that human beings should pour more money into finding other planets for living in the future instead of continuing to inhabit on the earth. while I agree that living condition on our planet has become increasingly difficult, I would argue that we must joint hand to tackle more emergency global problems.
On the one hand, it is possible that governments should invest in exploring new planets for their residents to live in the future, due to the serious pollution on the earth. Over thousands of years of existence and development, human beings have destroyed the environment severely. Emission from heavy industries as well as means of transport is the primary cause of global warming, which brings terrible disasters and killing many people every year. This really raises the question of whether in the future, the earth would still be our ideal shelter.
On the other hand, researching extra-terrestrial living is too extravagant while there are several urgent worldwide issues need solving. If humans can deal with that problems, the world will be better; therefore, moving to another planet such as Mars to live is not essential. For example, governments should spend the national budget on cutting poverty or protecting the environment rather than on developing astronomy. Furthermore, from my point of view, it seems difficult for human beings to live in outer space. Although science and technology have been advanced, the hostile living condition on other planets demands us more than that, much less the risk from attacks by aliens also needs to be taken into consideration.
In conclusion, I believe that human beings should primarily spend money on addressing urgent global issues rather than dreaming of an outer space life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | hana99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | dungha23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | sho2501 | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950and 2010. 73
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... of continuing to inhabit on the earth. while I agree that living condition on our pl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...y people every year. This really raises the question of whether in the future, the earth would still be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, really, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24295774648 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69134577764 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.623984393 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336504669875 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115309143457 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773637667534 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193657571741 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098156819841 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.