In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the contemporary era, an increasing number of individuals are opting for online reading instead of purchasing paper books. The rationale behind this trend is that online reading is cost-free and offers a plethora of reading materials. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint as there are numerous advantages associated with reading paper books, and online reading has several shortcomings.
Firstly, one notable advantage of reading paper books is the absence of advertisements that can disrupt the reading experience. Unlike online reading platforms, traditional books provide a serene environment without any intrusive distractions. This allows readers to fully immerse themselves in the content and derive maximum enjoyment from the act of reading.
Additionally, the printing industry thrives on the production of paper books, thereby generating employment opportunities for countless individuals. By purchasing paper books, we contribute to the growth and sustainability of this industry, which ultimately benefits society as a whole. Conversely, the rise of online reading may jeopardize employment prospects within the publishing sector, leading to potential economic repercussions.
Moreover, paper books offer a unique tactile experience that cannot be replicated by their digital counterparts. The texture and feel of the pages create an intimate connection between the reader and the book, enhancing the overall reading experience. This sensory element greatly contributes to the joy and satisfaction derived from reading, which cannot be fully replicated through online means.
On the other hand, free-of-charge online reading presents a myriad of problems. Firstly, it poses a significant threat to copyright infringement. Authors invest their time and effort into creating remarkable literary works with the expectation of receiving due recognition and compensation. However, if readers are able to access these works online without charge, it undermines the incentives for authors to continue producing exceptional content. Consequently, the availability of quality literature, particularly in the fantasy genre, may be severely curtailed.
Additionally, the prevalence of pirated books is a direct consequence of free online reading. Pirated books are notorious for their subpar quality, which compromises the reader's overall experience. Furthermore, in several countries, accessing and distributing pirated books is deemed illegal, infringing upon intellectual property rights and contributing to an unlawful market.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that paying for printed books not only enriches our reading experience but also upholds the rights of creators. Therefore, I am staunchly opposed to the idea of reading online without any form of payment. The advantages offered by paper books, such as an undisturbed reading environment, job opportunities in the printing industry, and a tangible connection with literature, far outweigh the shortcomings associated with free online reading. It is imperative that we recognize the value of traditional books and support the creators who fuel literary innovation.
- An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and there is no longer a sense of community What do you think are the causes of this situation What solutions can you suggest 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 1615.20841683 168% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02222222222 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20262546617 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557777777778 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 506.74238477 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5647540454 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200566498587 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589455259828 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376834571731 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103008383126 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406178322864 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 78.4519038076 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.