It is argued that in the coming years, paper-based newspapers and books will be useless as this aspect that people can access to those materials freely on the internet. This essay disagrees with the aforementioned statement due to the following. Firstly, this essay will discuss the fact that still, many people cannot access technology in some developing countries and secondly, enlarges upon that accessing many online materials will not be free as they are not now.
It is clear that in many far-away villages in some underdeveloped countries, people still suffer from poverty and do not have this opportunity to access the internet. So, they have to use published books for their education, and bringing technology to those places require many funds. Therefore, removing paper-based books and magazines at least in the close future would not be possible.
Reading books is one of the significantly important methods for gaining information leading to personal development. Because of emerging cutting-edge technology, reading books and magazines through smartphones, kindle, and so forth are becoming popular these days. It is true that the internet prepare the environment to access information in a more convenient way and without paying money, but still many books and papers cannot be available freely. Willey magazine is one of the prime examples that its articles are not free of charges.
While others think that using online materials is environmentally friendly, it would have some adverse ramifications. For producing electronic devices such as laptop, iPad, and computer it is necessary to established many factories which can damage nature more that cutting trees for producing paper. However, recent technology asserted that can produce paper from substantial materials that will not be harmful to nature.
According to what is stated above it is concluded that, however some people assume that paper-based books will disappear in the future, this would not happen because of high cost of establishing technology in some developing countries.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely Discuss both views and five your 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely Discuss both views and five your 48
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is argued that in the coming years, p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not be free as they are not now. It is clear that in many far-away villag...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e close future would not be possible. Reading books is one of the significantl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its articles are not free of charges. While others think that using online mat...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that will not be harmful to nature. According to what is stated above it is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pen because of high cost of establishing technology in some developing countries....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, at least, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88433267845 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0675263936 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23003594067 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076965981703 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497318435456 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122605711451 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624560634498 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.