In the future, people may have to live on other planets. Some think that is therefore important to spend money researching other planets such as Mars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Elon Musk, A billionaire who owns SpaceX, which is a private company works in aerospace field, has a plan to fly people on Mars in 2050 to start a new live on there. In the future, Earth may not be suitable for human to live for hundreds years later due to many problems about popularity, resources, energy, etc. Many people say that we should spend money to research a colonization to a new planet and build our society there. Others give opposite opinion that we should use that money to recovery the planet Earth. From my point of view, I strongly agree with the statement that people need to research about living on another planet.
Firstly, the problem from climate change will make large area of habitable soil to useless soil in the near future. The speed of desertification and sea level rise will decrease the living area of more than 50 million people in 2030. The global warming is the reason for those problem due to exhaust gas from industrial process and vehicles combining the deforestation for agriculture and living places. People have taken many actions to solve that difficulty by using electric vehicles, planting trees on buildings and increasing the effectiveness of manufacturing, however, the growth of population lead to the growth of greenhouse polluting sources. Secondly, the explosion of popularity make the use of natural resources blooms away. More people means more food need to be produced; more land for growing crops, feeding cattle and storing goods. Moreover, people are forced to live in harsh area due to land to leave are smaller day by day and the cost for them is too high for them to adapt.
Additionally, learning about cosmos will help people developing the knowledge of how to travel and living on the other planet. People always want to catch their dream about space travel and colonize new planet come from movies so that many agencies try to bring it in to realistic. Investment from government and society pushing scientists develop new technologies to help them find the answer for the dream of humanity. Nevertheless, people should balance the amount of money in researching new place to live and in upgrading the living standard of citizens. The priority should be consider to make life at the present and in the future better.
In conclusion, although large amount of money should spend for tackling the difficulties on Earth in order to make our lives better, the investment in researching other planets for people to live is worth it due to many problems that people already have faced and new problems they will get in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-19 | Hoang Minh | 63 | view |
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media including watching TV surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that negative and positive development 80
- Today many people do not realize how important the natural world is Why is this How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world 73
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'those problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; those problems
...0. The global warming is the reason for those problem due to exhaust gas from industrial proc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...ard of citizens. The priority should be consider to make life at the present and in the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87755102041 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60813168232 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521541950113 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0966213774 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236304147949 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797321330497 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717184405713 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171777623217 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718012084164 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.