The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem.

In today’s rapidly changing globalized world, the problem of indigence is one of the main pressing issue, requiring immediate attention. In this essay will discuss about the reasons behind this situation along with the solution to ameliorate the situation.

There are many reasons, which leads to make poor people more poor and rich people become richer. One of major reason of poverty in any country is unemployment. Poverty of a country is directly proportion to the number of unemployed people of same country. For instance, in asian countries almost more than 900 million people are without any job. Therefore, they are unable to earn and support their families , hence forced to live life under poverty line. The problem would get worst if government would not take immediate and effective action.

The second biggest reason of indigence is overpopulation. We have many example of wealthy countries which faced economical fall because of the over-population. If a country is over populated, there will be always shortage of resources. Hence, people of that country will remain poor always. For example, China is a big country with natural resources and overly populated cities. Few years back the population was kept increasing, until the Chinese government passed the rule of “one child per family”. Since then the poverty ration has been in control.

In the conclusion, I would like to say that I firmly belief that every country can solve this issue by many several effective ways. It is responsibility of government and each individual too. Government could play major role to resolve the problem by passing strong laws. At the same time, people should give their contribution by following those laws.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nable to earn and support their families , hence forced to live life under poverty...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the worst'.
Suggestion: get the worst
...e under poverty line. The problem would get worst if government would not take immediate ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'many examples'.
Suggestion: many examples
...of indigence is overpopulation. We have many example of wealthy countries which faced econom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...people of that country will remain poor always. For example, China is a big country wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le of 'one child per family'. Since then the poverty ration has been in con...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28158844765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7887999953 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7720447906 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5789473684 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208654025519 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575681658328 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906139200211 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116700358178 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674957912234 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.