Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Genetic modification, along with other biological technologies, is pioneering the world’s healthcare industry. And although people hold mixed opinions about this medical field, I believe that human interference with genes will change our world in an optimistic way, particularly in ending problems that have lasted for centuries like HIV or genetic disorders.
Some groups of people, especially those concerned about human rights, fear that genetic engineering would be exploited for evil purposes such as genetically modified crops and human cloning. If these things happened, they believe, terrible scenarios like the third world war might come when tyrants like Adolf Hitler would be revived, the rich would use internal organs taken from clone humans, and people’s health would suffer due to vegetables whose genes were modified. Moreover, human modification of genes could also reduce biodiversity among human beings as babies are shaped and chosen before they are born. Therefore, some unique but so-called “inferior” physical characteristics like a big nose, a black complexion, and small eyes, to name but a few, would be removed from future generations.
However, it is undeniable that genetic modification could solve several prolonged medical issues like HIV, AIDS, genetic disorders, gene-related diseases and at the present, the food crisis. HIV and AIDS have long been a worldwide problem, which plays a noticeable role in the poverty of many African countries. For that reason, if scientists apply genetic engineering to help HIV/AIDS mothers give birth to healthy babies, the number of HIV/AIDS patients would be minimized significantly, thus relieving the financial and medical burden of developing nations. Additionally, many genetic disorders and gene-related diseases like diabetes and heart disease would no longer be a concern to medical workers. Finally, many plant species with superior characteristics have already helped countries get the needed food source, despite unfavourable situations like climate change, sea levels rising, and urbanization which takes away many hectares of agricultural land.
Finally, although there are potential risks, I think that genetic engineering, if conducted suitably and legally, will have the ability to improve the worldwide healthcare system, which later leads to a shift in the economy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 89 | view |
2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 89 | view |
2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 84 | view |
2023-08-31 | thecong2007 | 80 | view |
2023-03-10 | hyst12 | 78 | view |
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 73
- writng task 1 ielts academic table 56
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an optimistic way" with adverb for "optimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...erence with genes will change our world in an optimistic way, particularly in ending problems that h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be removed from future generations. However, it is undeniable that genetic m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 964, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way many hectares of agricultural land. Finally, although there are potential ri...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, thus, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75783475783 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90842029507 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663817663818 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9643824065 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.416666667 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166531734368 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588511223146 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284274663085 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986973788111 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183618778128 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.72 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.