The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
The bar graph compares the coffee yield in 4 separate nations over a period of 20 years, starting from 1990.
Overall, except for Colombia, it is evident that most countries experienced a steady increase in coffee production. Additionally, throughout the period shown, Brazil succeeded in maintaining its position as the top nation for the amount of coffee produced while Vietnam tended to make the least amounts.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1990, a minor difference of around 0.1 million tonnes was seen in the production of coffee in Brazil and Columbia. Moreover, producing 0.2 million tonnes, Indonesia’s coffee yield was twice as much as that of Vietnam. Five years later, coffee producers in Brazil boosted their production to 1 million tonnes while Columbia was the nation whose amount of coffee produced experienced an insignificant decrease. Meanwhile, both Indonesia and Vietnam underwent no variation in their coffee production.
In the remaining years of the period, Brazil’s coffee yield witnessed noticeable growth, causing it to reach its peak of 1.9 million tonnes in 2010. By contrast, at 0.3 million tonnes, Columbia coffee producers lost half of their production at the end of the period. In addition, a minor but stable increase in coffee production in Indonesia and Vietnam was recorded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university Do the advantaged of having a gap year outweigh its disadvantages 89
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 89
- More tasks at home and work are being done by robots Do the pros outweigh the cons 89
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.336492891 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83144320019 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6786677945 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224238556591 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966688464113 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493367132014 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143243659228 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403407218775 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.