The chart compares coffee production in 4 different nations (Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and Vietnam) between 1990 and 2010.
In general, it can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward except for Colombia. Additionally, the coffee production in Brazil was the highest, while Vietnam had the lowest production shown on the chart.
Turning to the chart for details, the amount of coffee produced in Brazil started at 0.7 million tonnes in the first year, compared to 0.6 million tonnes of coffee made in Colombia. Over the next 20 years, Brazil’s coffee production increased dramatically reaching a peak of 1.9 million tonnes. In contrast, there was a considerable fall in the production of coffee in Colombia, which hit the lowest point about 0.3 million tonnes.
In terms of the remaining countries, Indonesia produced nearly 0.2 million tonnes in 1990, which was double Vietnam’s coffee production (0.1 million tonnes). In the next 5 years, these figures for Indonesia and Vietnam remained relatively unchanged before growing significantly, at 0.4 and 0.3 million tonnes respectively.
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 11
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s coffee production 0.1 million tonnes. In the next 5 years, these figures for Ind...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, except for, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37356321839 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82062150383 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5609558375 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185703663326 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101927102189 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808983368443 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140687880844 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767685213965 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.