The governement should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that, studies have become the most crucial part of a child’s life. It is believed that spending more currency on science teachings will boost the country’s development. However, I disagree with the given statement, as this will have a negative influence on the mental health of children.
Firstly, studying the same subject over and over again will lead to monotony in the life of children. As a result of this, their interest will decline and hence, this will affect their performance in the given subject. Moreover, it will not assist in the mental development of the student. For instance, a study by Harvard university revealed the pupils who spent six hours per day studying science alone scored poorly as compared to the one who studied two or more subjects during the same period. Thus, focusing on a single area of study limits the mental abilities of the learner.
On the contrary, by providing more funds to science only, the students will be unable to follow their passion in other fields. Furthermore, the knowledge of one subject can be applied in other areas, as all the fields of study are interlinked to each other. Therefore, giving equal preference to all the academic areas will be more helpful for the proper development of a nation. In addition to it, if the pupils will get a chance to learn the field of their interest then they will perform their duties more enthusiastically.
To conclude, authorities should pay equal attention to all the academic branches. After all every subject has an important contribution in the success of a country and none of the fields can be undermined.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, then, therefore, thus, after all, for instance, in addition, as a result, it is true, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92028985507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77066617482 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56884057971 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.352783441 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166468495984 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608290817109 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048169975031 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102663068727 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289430738331 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.