Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The authorities regularly come under fire for investing in projects such as music festivals or art exhibitions and this growing criticism is due to the fact that some feel that money would be better spent on healthcare, education or crime prevention. I agree with this idea to a large extent; however, funding spent in this area can be justified and, therefore, valid arguments for both sides of this issue will be presented in this essay.
There are a number of compelling arguments to support the idea that public services would benefit from money that has been allocated to the arts. The fundamental one is healthcare sector where government around the world face tremendous challenges due to limited resources to tackle most pressing or urgent issues. For instance, they require an astronomical amount of money allocation not only to fight with life-threatening new or old diseases such as malaria, cancers etc. but also to safe-regard consistently public health from malnutrition by spending those in medical infrastructure, employing doctors and nurses, and campaigning to raise public awareness. Admittedly, Education sector is another of great importance where administration needs to take extra-care because educated and intelligent citizens are the asset or back-bone to run public institutions or private corporations in any state. Moreover, it is government’s sacred duty and obligation to ensure public safety and freedom of movement of the general public from numerous crimes for example murder, burglary, terrorism etc. for which they must pour handsome amount in preventive measures as well as post-crime investigation and jurisdiction.
Despite this, the counter argument for investment in the arts should also be considered. Principally, advocates argue that sometimes individual needs entertainment and/or amusement for which art department do the best job in order to lead happy life or escape hectic life or revitalize themselves. To ensure enrichment and improvement of this branch govt. could redistribute country’s wealth to allocate certain amount or even subsidize for art related activities, and give a helping hand to promising artists by encouraging and supporting them financially.
In conclusion, in an ideal world, there would be money in abundance for both areas; nevertheless, as this is not the case, and there is a lack of funding in infrastructure, education and healthcare systems, then I have to agree that money being assigned to these areas is of far greater importance than the arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | wardiati | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | danial08cse | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | danial08cse | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion. 67
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion. 78
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1019, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...c safety and freedom of movement of the general public from numerous crimes for example murder...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aging and supporting them financially. In conclusion, in an ideal world, there ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48091603053 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17875973675 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615776081425 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8037888325 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.857142857 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263528881112 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079954933151 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563421486081 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148008722119 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564451630443 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.