The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extend do you agree?
It is argued that government supposed to invest a large amount of money on science-based subject. While I share a similar view with essential of funding on science for country development and progress, it is also arguable that government endowment on training other fundamental subjects play an important role for the nation.
One reason why the government ought to allocate a large amount of financial funding to train people about science subjects such as physics and chemistry is because of these subjects can determine the nation development. Taking Germany as an example, the government has been investing money on educating science-based subject since a few decades ago, which results in the advancement in science and technology and make the country among the leading nations in the world, and eventually leads to an increase of national prosperity along with enhancing of public welfare. Thus, it is clear that government endowment on educating people about science can bring benefits for the nations.
However, this does not mean that social-based subjects such as communication should be completely neglected by the government. First of all, communication is the principal knowledge ought to be acquired by the people as they live in a community where they need social skills to socialize. To ensure that the people have decent insight about social capabilities, government grant on teaching people about these subjects is a must.
To sump up, although government financial support on educating people about science highly beneficial for country’s advancement, I consider that educating people about other fundamental subjects is also critical matter requiring sufficient amount of financial support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ajayjain831 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer's total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that women should be able to join the army, navy or air forces like what men do. Others think that only men should do thatTo what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Government should spend more money for the construction in railways rather than in roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give examples and evidences to support your position. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55681818182 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00502477495 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9331644142 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243436231008 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108711074422 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067635948208 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158966116746 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077566264858 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.