The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress.To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress.

To what extent do you agree?

The level of scientific research represents the national power of a country. I totally agree with the view that the government should spend more money on teaching sciences rather than other subjects like arts and humanities.

First and foremost, the progress of sciences is the foundation of economic growth. In today’s globalized world, competition between countries is fierce, and scientific progress is the key for one country to outcompete others. This is because technology advancement is based on the solid grasp of scientific knowledge, especially in this age when technology is becoming more intricate than ever before. Therefore, by allocating more funding to teaching sciences, the government will help prepare a well-educated workforce and researchers for the future, contributing to the success of the economy.

Secondly, spending more on science teaching will improve people’s lives directly. All the tools and technology we use today are the products of sciences. For instance, researches in medical science bring us the cure for the incurable in the past, while the development of telecommunication and computer science offers us numerous electronic devices like smartphones and personal computers, which makes our lives more convenient and helps us to work efficiently. For that reason, more government’s spending on science subjects will benefit every citizen in our country.

Some argue that other disciplines such as arts and humanities are of equal importance to sciences because these subjects benefit us culturally. For example, learning art helps people to appreciate the beauty of artworks. However, I do not believe that these benefits are in the same league as sciences bring us. Today many people are still living under the bread line, and the widening wealth disparity has made the situation even worse. It is unrealistic to expect these poor people to learn about aesthetic appreciation.

In conclusion, spending more funding on scientific indoctrination will have overwhelmingly positive effects on society, and this is the sound strategy that the government should adopt.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-28 ieltsdestroyer999 78 view
2019-02-14 lusinemamikonyan 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6149068323 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10135736401 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5948378577 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316466162837 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913095303738 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845670652963 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170356451836 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696015500512 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.