The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer

Essay topics:

The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms. Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer.

Public authorities have been playing a significant role in human societies. Some people believe that smoking should be prohibited ( forbidden) in public areas even if citizens’ liberties would be limited. I strongly agree with this statement since I consider a human right of fresh air to be more valuable.

During smoking, people fill the air with a gas which can cause an indirect damage to nearby people’s health. Smokers are protected because most cigarettes have a special filter to secure it’s user from poisoning substances. However, people outside are more vulnerable since they do not clear air while breathing. According to recent studies, passive smokers are more susceptible to develop cancer due to impure air they inhale. In other words, people in public places who do not smoke absorb more toxins, that lead to their health issues.

Smokers also provide bigger expenses for urban environment maintenance, causing trash bin fire and producing more garbage on streets. People usually throw a burning cigarette in a trash can, which may entail a fire and a destroyed container that should be replaced. In addition, individuals tend to miss and leave butts on the ground, which requires an additional cleaning of public places. For example, Germany reported that its local senators have been able to reduce the amount of workers since public smoking became prohibited. Thus, cigarettes consumption outside private property enlarges local budgets, which are funded by non smokers as well.

In conclusion, I strongly agree with the restriction of public smoking because other people’s health and money are also involved without their permission.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-06 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 89 view
2022-04-17 staytogether 84 view
2020-08-25 sarah830 73 view
2020-08-16 sarah830 84 view
2020-04-13 vdrobny 78 view
Essays by user vdrobny :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieve that smoking should be prohibited forbidden in public areas even if citize...
^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'indirect damage'.
Suggestion: indirect damage
...fill the air with a gas which can cause an indirect damage to nearby people’s health. Smokers are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: TO_VB_ITS_NN[26]
Message: Did you mean 'to secure its user'?
Suggestion: to secure its user
...e most cigarettes have a special filter to secure it’s user from poisoning substances. However, peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...arettes have a special filter to secure it’s user from poisoning substances. However...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39463601533 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65173407491 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0702846649 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206374285471 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677472395398 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663398927814 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133395861715 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401463412396 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.