The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

In recent yeas, public awareness of air pollution has increased tremendously in every society which raises the issues of whether the government should impose a fee on drivers to alleviate air pollution. Some people might believe such scheme is nit a good idea. However as far as I am concerned, levying a fee would be helpful for preserving the environment.

First at all, the policy which imposes a fee on drivers at rush hour would be financial burden to own car drivers. It enables them to use public transport. As a case in point, carbon dioxide emissions of one's own car are same amount of four public transport carbon dioxide emissions. It also eases traffic congestion too.

In addition, gathering taxes can be used by other eco-friendly industries. Although, the government impose a fee, some drivers might drive one's own car. They would be fin a penalties and it can be used environment preserve programmes. It is another way to relive the air pollution.

In conclusion, the government should impose a fee on drivers that drive one's own car at rush hour. the reason why it can reduce the carbon dioxide emission and make a budget to use for environmentally friendly programmes.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...believe such scheme is nit a good idea. However as far as I am concerned, levying a fee...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on dioxide emissions of ones own car are same amount of four public transport car...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s that drive ones own car at rush hour. the reason why it can reduce the carbon dio...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 202.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92079207921 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8581296348 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4366845205 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4615384615 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192106165264 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682978894134 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705957343956 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128748419171 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03672561064 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.