The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the investment of governments has become a broad issue to the general public. A school of thoughts believes that the funding of the government should be spent more on teaching science than non-scientific subjects to help countries to develop and progress. I am of the opinion that investing in educating science-related fields is necessary but some extra subjects are of no less importance.
On the one hand, it is understandable why teaching science should be financially supported more by the government. The main reason is that science plays an important role in any nation’s progress and development. If science does not exist, definitely scientific advances can not be created. As a result, a nation will not never innovate or evolve and become backward. Another reason is that scientific breakthroughs help a nation to strengthen its position on the global stage. According to the BBC news, the most powerful countries around the world spend a much larger amount of their national budgets on science than the others.
On the other hand, it seems to be not wise when underestimating the significance of other subjects. The key rationale is that other subjects like art, literature, language also provide a wide range of useful skills. For example, By studying art subjects, people would have a chance to develop creative thinking that is an essential skill for any successes or development. Additionally, If sciences receive more government financial support, other subjects would have to face insufficient funding. A nation could not achieve sustainable growth if other areas such as history are less developed.
In conclusion, although science is the first priority for any investment of the government to help progress and develop a nation’s economy. It seems to me that apart from the budget for teaching science, a suitable amount of money should be spent on non-science subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | Nicole Yu | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-03 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | samdilnura | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 78 | view |
- Some people think that nuclear energy is better than other sources of power for meeting ever increasing global needs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 56
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- Some people say that increasing business and cultural contacts between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rnments has become a broad issue to the general public. A school of thoughts believes that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26384364821 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05134020331 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7572484903 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353217237433 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105684011605 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863201167947 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225092219589 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735007826674 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.