In a country, most of the population travel through public transport to get to their everyday destination. The prompt suggests that government should focus on improving railways rather than roads. I do not agree with this statement mainly for two reason which I will discuss in the essay.
To begin, half of the population of a country does not own private cars. Thus, they use public transport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workplace or school. Although trains are a widely used public transport, it will be unfair to ignore the development of roads. For example, professionals often need to take trains to their work. But students are mostly admitted to schools in their own cities or nearby cities and such shorter distances are covered by public bus. So, if government shifts their focus only on upgrading railways rather than roads, students will face increased difficulties in their everyday travels. Therefore, government should try to expend money in improving both the media of transports.
Moreover, Spending money on railways only will deteriorate the conditions of roads day by day. Tourists visiting the country does not only use trains, rather they use rental cars, public bus etc. to navigate from one place to another. And if funds were spent only behind railways, tourists would face difficulty in travelling by road. Consequently, this might defame the country lessening tourist visits further.
To conclude, Government should focus equally on improving roads and railway systems. Focusing on only one media of transport will cause difficulty for the population using the other media for their daily travels.
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- The charts below show the average consumption of three nutrients by adults in the UK All of these nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., they use public transport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workp...
^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
...sport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workplace or school. Although tra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one medium', 'a medium', or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: one medium; a medium; media
...s and railway systems. Focusing on only one media of transport will cause difficulty for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23396226415 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6362820487 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4926544818 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5882352941 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204858477725 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684117995367 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841431290243 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140091449275 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760821370576 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.