Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In a country, most of the population travel through public transport to get to their everyday destination. The prompt suggests that government should focus on improving railways rather than roads. I do not agree with this statement mainly for two reason which I will discuss in the essay.
To begin, half of the population of a country do not own private cars. Thus, they use public transport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workplace or school. Although trains are a widely used public transport, it will be unfair to ignore the development of roads. For example, professionals often need to take trains to their work. But students are mostly admitted to schools in their own cities or nearby cities and such kind of comparatively shorter distances are covered by public bus. So, if government shifts their focus only on upgrading railways rather than roads, students will face increased difficulty in everyday travels. Therefore, government should try to expend money in improving both the media of transports.
Moreover, Spending money on railways only will deteriorate the conditions of roads day by day. Tourists visiting the country does not only use trains, rather they use rental cars, public bus etc. to navigate from one place to another. And if funds were spent only behind railways, tourists will face difficulty in travelling by road. Consequently, this might defame the country lessening tourist visits further.
To conclude, Government should focus equally on improving roads and railway systems. Focusing on only one media of transport will cause difficulty for the population using the other media for their daily travels.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 61
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated Write a response in which you discu 58
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced 9 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., they use public transport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workp...
^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
...sport such as- bus , minibus and trains to reach their workplace or school. Although tra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one medium', 'a medium', or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: one medium; a medium; media
...s and railway systems. Focusing on only one media of transport will cause difficulty for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24344569288 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66829399184 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0984364773 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3529411765 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212759015054 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071718314505 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830443809372 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143694580852 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734194775851 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.