The main budget allocations decided by authorities for improvement of transport infrastructure should be through railways, instead of roads. I partially agree that governments ought to give central attention to the railways because, in my view, distances and geographical specifications are the main considerations in deciding resource spending for transport.
Railways play a vital role for both short-distance and long-distance trips and for cargo transportation purposes in the lifes of people. Several reasons are considered to be acceptable and important to make local official bodies give a specific care for development of railways. First of all, railways lead to less traffic congestion. If railway system had not been established in big congolemerats and urban areas, significant and very frequent traffic jams would have become in these locations. Additionally, revolutionary changes in technology pave the way to produce speedy and environmentally friendly railways which in turn reduce carbon dioxide emissions into the air.
However, railway construction is not suitable for short distances and geographical locations where the importance of roads cannot be denied. From financial point of view, buses and private cars are preferred to railways because of their cheapness and comfort. Moreover, nagorna places are dangerous for railways leading to explosion reasons.
In conclusion, despite railways are undeniably essential in daily needs and lifes of people, governments should prioritise money spending considering geographical constraints and preferences based on distances.
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away. 89
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that children should learn how to compete but others think that children should be taught to corporate co become more useful adults. Express some reasons to give your own opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00873362445 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32198190489 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685589519651 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6561184458 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168781131516 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623249711911 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325072297533 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105264393615 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198838204538 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.