In recent years, more and more governments in different countries are investing more money fort railway infrastructure. However, I strongly disagree with this idea, because railway construction leads some environmental problems and train is not as convenient as other transportation.
To begin with, building new railways may cause some damage to our environment. Some natural land would be destroyed in the process of building railways, and train stations as well, and the environment would be irreversibly damaged for a long time. For instance, some wild animals would be forced to leave their habitats and have no place. Besides, air pollution would be also caused due to the construction of rail infrastructure. These harmful particles might make us unhealthy and cause some diseases, such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.
In addition to the environmental factor, taking trains is not always convenient for every resident. People who live in rural areas, such as high mountains, have to rely on road for transport, because railways are not easy to built there. If our government spends money only on construction of railways but not roads, it is not fair for these people who also pay for taxes. Moreover, railways are not always convenient for residents living in cities. Some citizens are used to take trains to go to work, but it takes a long time to wait for trains in rush hours. In contrast, driving cars is much easier for communicating.
In conclusion, I agree with that government should should take responsibilities to establish convenient transportations. However, I don’t think investing more money only on rail infrastructure is right for the reasons I mentioned above.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 84
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 52
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
.... Some citizens are used to take trains to go to work, but it takes a long time to wa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...onclusion, I agree with that government should should take responsibilities to establish conv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32841328413 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18567106849 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9528518397 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147376454788 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526345731747 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667659280557 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106980254911 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592761641383 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.