Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Now day, both of railways and roads are needed in for transportation. while some goverments prefer to sum up large propotion of money for high speed ways, the others make use of large percentage for roads 's development. However, ithink railways construction is more important than roads. "As" this essay will explain the importance of railways to our communities.
To begin, commutes who travel to and from work or school on their daily life basis. Meanwhile, those are concern with safety of the high speed ways rather than novelity services that trains provided. For exampe: if someone drives train, and the railway is suitable, he will concentrate on driving by leading the drive to professional control which is the train. As constracting arailway not only prevent accident but also facilitate travelling between cities. This will result in development of economy of our countries.Also, this will improvement and convenience of high speed way transportation.
After all these explanation, it is evedient that, the more goverment spends money on railways construction, the more it would save our lives as well as reduce traffic crowded inside cities.
However, this not mean ignorance of roads. Because focusing on roads will ensure safety inside cities. But may result on increase relase of carbon dioxide; the main gas that contribute to global warming problem All over the world.
in conclusion, it can be seen that, goverment should spend large propotion of money for railways development. Because this will result in trasportation advancement as well as decrease traffic overcrowding.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...roads are needed in for transportation. while some goverments prefer to sum up large ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for roads s development. However, ithink railways construction is more important ...
^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...development of economy of our countries.Also, this will improvement and convenience ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this explanation' or 'these explanations'?
Suggestion: this explanation; these explanations
...h speed way transportation. After all these explanation, it is evedient that, the more govermen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...hat, the more goverment spends money on railways construction, the more it would save ou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ever, this not mean ignorance of roads. Because focusing on roads will ensure safety in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...al warming problem All over the world. in conclusion, it can be seen that, goverm...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, after all, in conclusion, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37698412698 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0046024786 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6176167324 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173659483218 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591734449033 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525033898316 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945762917484 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330466784083 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.