Some people think that government ought to concentrate wealth on railways over roads. I am totally in favour of the given idea. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
To begin with, the advocates of roads transport insist that laying a heavy emphasis on roadways requires less capital investment than other modes of transport. Because the cost of constructing, operating and maintaining roads is considerably economical, and roads are generally constructed by the regime and local authorities. So a small revenue is charged for the construction of roads. In addition, door to d...
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profitmakingcompanies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages? 96
- Bar Chart 1: Number of Marriage and Divorces in the USA 1970-2000Bar Chart 2: Marital status of adult Americans, 1970 and 2000 79
- Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (picture, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 59
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1648 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.955 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.297 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.516 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.072 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83161512027 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07423225876 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642611683849 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.757352363 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141275031873 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05059067087 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430093420706 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954228211765 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403799303342 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.