The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizen’s health rather than on protecting Environment. Do you agree or disagree?
Given the government’s funding, there is an argument that instead of pouring money on protecting the environment, this money will be more effectively used for medical studies to enhance people’s health quality. It seems to me that while the urgency for new medical remedies is rapidly increasing, the seriousness of environmental issues still cannot be ignored.
Today, government’s conscience about the extreme importance of medical research is higher than ever. The outbreak of the new virus COVID-19 leading to thousands of deaths and the closure of the economies really has had a profound effect on authorities as for the first time, they have given priority to medicine rather than economy. But not only in the weak of the disastrous pandemic when a vaccine is virtually required do medical investigations is important but our day-to-day lives are also in need of these: people’s craving for a cure for deathly deseases such as HIV/AIDS, cancer..., drugs to eliminate chronic illness or supersede long-lasting treatment. Therefore, government’ funding is worth being speeded on medical research.
On the other hand, environmental problems have been witnessed to rise at an alarming rate and posed a direct threat on people’ lives. From air pollution, contaminated water which lead to many respiratory, digestive deseases to the more intensive frequency of extreme weather conditions resulting from global warming, greenhouse effect are causing a lot of damages and casualties. All these proofs remind us of people’s responsibilities for caring our habitat and therefore, reinforce the notion about how necessarily government’s funding should be focused on the issue.
In conclusion, both environment and health significant aspects of our lives hence neither of them can be indifferent by the government.
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizen s health rather than on protecting Environment Do you agree or disagree 84
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizen s health rather than on protecting Environment Do you agree or disagree 84
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, so, still, therefore, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57347670251 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18232745434 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663082437276 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6550755281 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197095420515 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762050055108 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067955318294 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103592665851 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532660968856 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.