Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Conservation of the environment is a matter of considerable concern among nations all around the globe owing to its importance as a human’s habitat. I strongly believe that the government bodies and giant corporations should turn around the environmental damage due to their power of the legislation and subsidy.
Governments and companies can curb environmental pollution by enforcing rules and regulations. Air pollution, as an example, causes environmental damage, stemmed from operation vehicles and factory production. Hence, if laws are enacted for restricting their use, the amount of carbon footprint will be severely reduced, resulting in safeguarding the environment. similarly, the same approaches can be used for the other sectors of a country to limit pollution.
Furthermore, under no circumstances can the environment be protected until the sufficient budget are allocated which governments and huge companies solely have. Consider the conservation programmes such as hybrid cars, biofuel, renewable sources of energy, and so on, are contingent upon the adequate funding, no matter how either willing or reluctant the individuals are to improve environment through undermining the negative effects of fossil fuels. Therefore, the more sustainable schemes, the less environmental pollutants and the less harm.
It might be said that environmental preservation can hardly be achieved unless every individual show cooperation since without them, no laws and money can bring responsibility as well as protection. Despite this, it seems that the role of governments and large companies are to concentrate the energy, wealth and endeavour to not only safeguard the environment from unsustainable exploitation but also minimize the waste of energy money and personal will.
In conclusion, although individuals could save the environment by doing some activities, I think that protecting the environment should be done by the hand of huge companies and governmental authorities. This is mainly due to governments’ power to pass strict rules and having a substantial amount of budget for devoting to environmental conservation sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | KhaledAkbari | 84 | view |
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to wor for company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 81
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 89
- Nowadays shopping has become a new favourite pastime for young people What are the reasons for this Should they be encouraged to develop other hobbies How 92
- Nowadays newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...ulting in safeguarding the environment. similarly, the same approaches can be used for th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he environment by doing some activities, I think that protecting the environment ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83962264151 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39481102582 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5417465974 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.846153846 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146766695441 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533394834626 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296135332566 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823959449327 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316373450733 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.