Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Government should invest on new railways rather than build new roads. I strongly agree.
To begin with, Railways have fewer impacts on environment than roads. For instance, if a train work with its full capacity, it would consume less energy than cars for each passenger. With this in mind, encouraging people to substitute using roads with trains would have long-term effects especially on environment.
Secondly, Railways have higher rate of safety than roads. Trains move on specific railway and all of them are monitored by experts which means that the probability of crashing two trains is almost zero. On the other side, crashing two cars is inevitable and the large number of people die on roads every day. In fact, roads increase the medical care expenditures and charge government more than trains.
Lastly, people can easily do their daily routines when they are in a train. It is undoubtedly a very important feature. Reading books, sleeping, playing games and doing job remotely, for example, are all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the corridors and prevent to get backache.
In conclusion, train has many advantages which outweigh road’s benefits. Governments should encourage people to use railway mode by virtue of invest money on its infrastructures and decrease the price of its tickets. Government also would be benefited from that. If Government puts railways first in its priorities, it does not need to spend much money to mitigate environmental issues or accommodate medical care for people who are injured in car accidents.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-11-14 trpg143 84 view
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 67 view
Essays by user sinanarimani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
... all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21705426357 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71215927708 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6338428863 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1764705882 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25119580786 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072767956335 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593083480204 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138129559624 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560751120635 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.