Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that more budgets should be allocated to railways than roads by governments. This essay totally agrees with this view due to the fact that railroads are better modes of transportation than roads.
Initially, railroads could help people save a lot of time compared to roads. Particularly, trains may achieve speeds up to hundreds km/h not only because of how tracks are engineered but also they can not be stuck in traffic jams like road vehicles. A staff, therefore, may get to his or her workplace without wasting time waiting for a bus or a taxi or in traffic congestion. Moreover, spending money on railways could be more efficient because of the large capacity of trains compared to that of all kinds of road transportation. In more detail, with the same amount of money, the governments can invest in a train that has more seats for passengers than lots of public transport. For instance, a train is configured for around 3000 to 4000 passengers, while there will need about 300 buses to carry this number of people. Clearly, allocating a budget to railways would bring a great deal of advantages for not only residents but also governments.
However, some people still claim that officials should not spend money on railways rather than roads because they are not as safe as roads. They may believe that there is a high risk of accidents when travelling by train. But I argue that the number of accidents happening in railroads are fewer than that of roads. To be specific, each train is controlled by experienced drivers who were trained for every scenario and there is a traffic light system to make sure trains do not collide.; this makes railways the safest mode. It seems that investing money in railroads could reduce the number of traffic accidents which often occur on roads.
To conclude, although some people think that governments should not spend money on railways as much as roads, I personally believe this view is not right since many benefits are offered when more budgets are allocated to railroads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give you 88
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these v 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accidents which often occur on roads. To conclude, although some people think ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89367816092 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63612583163 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531609195402 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0996777508 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.533333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248763445257 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857494858109 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799880331105 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178529560922 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518539401128 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.