Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, the transportation systems have become one of the concerns among individuals. Although many people strongly assume that the states should spend more of their national budget on railway systems than roads, I am of the opinion that the governments should invest on both of them.
On the one hand, there are several advantages of constructing more train lines that could not be denied. The most pivotal benefit is that a fleet is a sort of public transportation which could contain more passengers than any other kinds of vehicles, except aeroplane; hence, this could partly reduce the number of vehicles on the roads because passengers could use trains for travelling instead of cars or motorbikes. This also protects the environment as the less vehicles, the less fumes are wasted into the nature. Moreover, the train stations could also become attractions. For example, the Moscow station is one of the most well-known stations in the world, attracting thousands of visitors and giving the Russian government a large number of taxes.
On the other hand, the states should also spend the national budget on roads, especially highways because of a number of reasons. Firstly, roads or highways could be built in almost every geographical location such as the countryside or even mountain areas; therefore, they can assist people to travel to other places in a more convenient and faster way. Additionally, long-distance roads could help to connect different parts of a country, especially major economic regions which also improve the national economy in the long term and benefit companies. For instance, the Noi Bai-Lao Cai highway in VietNam allows products in Ha Noi to access the border with China easier which can save a significant amount of money for manufacturers.
In conclusion, it is obvious that there are different views about whether the states should invest more on either rail route systems or roads and highways. In my own opinion, both of them are equally important and the governments should construct more rail routes and long-distance roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...is also protects the environment as the less vehicles, the less fumes are wasted int...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fumes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e environment as the less vehicles, the less fumes are wasted into the nature. Moreo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...itors and giving the Russian government a large number of taxes. On the other hand, the states...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20535714286 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76349342395 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550595238095 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0436357856 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17766413384 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584673041143 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513971275722 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113207844167 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033062246106 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.