Governments spend millions of dollars each year on their space programmes. Most recently, Mars is the focus of scientists’ attention. Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home. Do you agree or disagree?
From my point view, the way that governments spend financial resources always explodes many controversies . Some people think millions of dollars each year spending on space programs would be used better to deal with problems in our planet. However, I cannot support this statement because of several reasons.
If you concern about social situation, you absolutely know there are a large number of people who do not have enough food and water or die because of polluted,.... But I assert that the governments always try to reduce the consequences of those striking problems. And I think they cannot interrupt space programs to save money for another problems because its researches has many positive impacts on our life.
Firstly, the research about space not only bring interesting information about other planets out of space, but also find out new scientific knowledge about the Earth. The satellites are able to measure the amount of groundwater, therefore scientists can see where the water is running out and give the warnings. Moreover, outer space systems can identify cosmic problems which would lead to serious consequences for our planet. For example, NASA discovered an ozone layer hole which was predicted to cause damage in 2060 - the end of the world. Soon after, they discussed with United Nations Organization about the solutions. So without space research, our home would definitely be in danger.
Secondly, vast space industry is a vital impulse for the global financial affairs. A big project in this aspect can enhance the amount of taxes for the state budget and these financial resources can sustain educational or pension systems.
Thirdly, I think it’s wonderful that scientists would find a new planet to move in in the future. Our Earth is getting overcrowded and face with many problems such as out of resources, polluted, waste accumulation underground,... Because of that, I think we need a new place to start a better life.
In conclusion, despite the urgency of social issues, I think we shouldn’t discontinue space programs. I also believe that the governments have the effective plans to spend financial resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-21 | Dyor | 71 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Dyor | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | Felicity Huang | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-11 | tuanhnguyen2611 | 74 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | duongthanhson | 95 | view |
- Governments spend millions of dollars each year on their space programmes Most recently Mars is the focus of scientists attention Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home Do you agree or disagree 74
- The graph below shows the number of Asia elephants between 1997 and 2004 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...urces always explodes many controversies . Some people think millions of dollars e...
^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ituation, you absolutely know there are a large number of people who do not have enough food and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ood and water or die because of polluted,.... But I assert that the governments al...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...entists would find a new planet to move in in the future. Our Earth is getting overcr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...polluted, waste accumulation underground,... Because of that, I think we need a ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21902017291 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80280492905 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605187319885 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.70999126 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3157894737 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251877508301 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725671355973 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918601975702 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127991513801 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924162032124 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.