The given line graph gives information about how many percentage of 5 different activities that old
people in America expenditured on spare time from 1980 to 2010.
What stands out from the line graph is that while the theatre declined, others activities had an upward
trend. In addition, Hiking was the most steadily increased during the given period.
In 1980, starting at three fifths watching TV was the highest before it witnessed a slightly improve to
about two thirds in 2010. In contrast, after ranked second in 1980 with a half, theatre noticeably reduce
to around morethan two fifths at the end of the period. The rate of reading troubled after some rise and
fall between 1980 and 2010 with less than a third and three fifths respectively.
Besides, it was hiking that started from a fifth before experiencing a steadily surge to become the
highest in 2010, at four fifth. Surfing the internet was the lowest in 1980 with just roughly one in twenty.
However, the ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010.
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
... line graph gives information about how many percentage of 5 different activities that old peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 27, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y improve to about two thirds in 2010. In contrast, after ranked second in 1980 w...
^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('surge') instead of another adjective.
...tarted from a fifth before experiencing a steadily surge to become the highest in 2010, at four...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...the ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010. ...
^^^
Line 11, column 54, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('soar') instead of another adjective.
...ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8956043956 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50586198385 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2873264821 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130809767463 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543876094933 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459722657986 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545326633939 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442746825475 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.