You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The chart illustrates how car ownership changed in one European country from 1971 to 2001. Unit is measured by percentage.
What stands out from the bar chart is that while no-car owners has a downward tendency, those possessing one or two car witnessed a fluctuation in this suggested country in the period given.
In the initial year, starting at the highest point with nearly 50%, the number of house owning no car at all experienced a significant drop to about 42% after 10 years. This figure, then continually went down by more than 10% during the next 10 years and saw a period of unchange during the last 10 years. Household with one car stood the second at about 35% which was two third of those with no car in 1971. After a gradual decrease by nearly a half in the next 20 years, this number gained its popularity to become the highest one in the last year (2001).
Turning to the two - car ownership, The first year of the period witnessed the fewerst percentages of all. After some rises and fall, this figure rose to more than 30% in the final year becoming the one with the second highest number of its ownners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 67
- The Charts Below Show The Percentage Of People Working In Different Sectors In Town A And Town B In 1960 2010
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt illustrates how car ownership changed in one European country from 1971 to 200...
^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable, so consider using: 'two cars'.
Suggestion: two cars
...nward tendency, those possessing one or two car witnessed a fluctuation in this suggest...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51470588235 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36537586324 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.457498083 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216422941599 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989575060053 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837489991797 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147699432224 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560457341816 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.