The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The given bar chart illustrates figures for the survey occurred in a Europe country about the number of guests who visit cinemas on days of the week for three years.
In general, there are not any markable difference in weekdays. However, this status dramatically changes in the weekend, especially on Saturdays, the number of customers reaches a peak.
To analyze the data shown in the graph, the figures of 4 first day of the week range between about 10 and 24. The significant point of this graph is that the number of customers keeps their position at 30 in 3 years. In the subsequent day, cinemas served the most significant number of visitors during the week. Especially in 2005, the percentage of guest takes approximate a half in total.
On Sunday, the percentage also occupies a high position with 30%,34% and 35% respectively in 2003, 2005 and 2007.
In brief, people tend to go to the theatre at the end of the week rather than on weekdays. This status might due to the study schedule and work schedule of the vast majority of citizens in the city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | jox | 56 | view |
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 78
- Choose an existing product, business or service and describe its features. 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, in brief, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 187.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71122994652 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59030058582 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2609976962 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128345844614 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461442938085 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280216101768 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585802802673 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186363975292 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.