Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Working as a group or a team is not uncommon nowadays. Some people say activities those are done alone are more effective. However, it can not be denied that group or team activities teach more pivotal skills for life.
Firstly, it helps to strengthen communicating skill. Working as a team requires members to communicate to solve the problem together. As much as conversations take place, they will know what to say when they meet new members, or how to reject an idea politely, for instance.
Secondly, social skills namely teamwork skill, cooperating skill can be gained through group activities. Participating in a team activity means working together. People taking part in those often have to cooperate with each other to create a production or just do the task that they are given. By that way, teamwork or cooperating skill will be gradually enhanced. Those can be considered as soft skills, which are totally useful in life.
Last but not least, team activities help reinforce the ability of tackling in different situations, especially dilemma. Meeting many different kinds of people is one of the aspects of group working that provides the chance to enhance the adaptibility. They talk to different people, work with different people. Therefore, they will have more experience in making new relationship and tackling in situations.
On the other hands, people who are not too sociable may find team activities terrifying. They may be scared of meeting new people or even talking to other people. In a group discussion, they might be silent throughoutly. As a result, they could not gain significant skills for life such as communicating skills or the ability of adapting.
In conclusion, despite of having some disadvantages on some people, group or team activities are claimed to teach more vital skills for life than those individual activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...ating skill will be gradually enhanced. Those can be considered as soft skills, which are...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...situations, especially dilemma. Meeting many different kinds of people is one of the aspects o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18811881188 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88759829641 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3944231871 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.15 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263240347055 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874248673298 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083985603856 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165192546417 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108718511015 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.