Nowadays it becomes more and more popular to let children watch TV, but is there really good effects for them in childhood? In this essay, we will look at both negative and positive sides and decide whether it beneficial or problematic for the young generation to watch television at such a juvenile age.
First of all, there are lots of programmes on TV for children today and the majority of them are educational. Not only it is entertaining for the child to watch them, but it is also useful because of the range of skills, which are improving while watching movies. For instance, the TV show "ABC" teaches children letters and lays foundation for reading. However, health can be worsened due to the fact of time spent sitting instead of playing active games. But most television programmes offer activities to move around while enjoying a favourite show.
Secondly, good and evil are typically clearly separated in films for the young generation, so it helps to learn the role of the kind and positive person, which leads to better communication with society. For example, child sees a model of favourite character's behaviour and tends to act similarly. As a result, we get a well-mannered persona, which is obviously a positive effect.
Finally, when watching films, everyone feels emotions, so the children do the same. Thay master their ability to control emotions and feelings, that means that television has a valuable effect.
Therefore, TV programmes can cause proper development on children and it can be a good part of their lives.
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 71
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling ,a gap year,before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons.For others this is an expensive waste of time .Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'characters'' or 'character's'?
Suggestion: characters'; character's
...xample, child sees a model of favourite characters behaviour and tends to act similarly. A...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05019305019 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81403353796 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0477986427 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134111039546 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047110530371 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358269988139 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741114332512 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243395857096 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.