Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both and give your own opinion,.
Over the past few decades, it has been increasingly rigorous for plants and animals to adapt to the current condition on the Earth due to the impacts stemming from human’s activities. While many people find it impossible to improve, others believe in its likelihood of change. Personally, I agree with the second statement and will support this view after discussing both opinions.
On the one hand, individuals against the possibility of improvement justify that these bad influences were exerted by inevitable activities. Indeed, the rising population presents an enormous demand for essential infrastructure for accommodation, entertainment or healthcare. This leads to the massive construction, releasing an excessive load of particulate matters, which can restrain species’ respiratory system. Another cause of negative effects can be found in intensive industrial production, the outcome of which is not only economic growth but also many environmental drawbacks: contamination of harmful gases (SO2, NOx) can cause acid rain; the needs of space for factories cause deforestation, as well as loss of natural cohabitation of species.
On the other hand, it is believed that effective measures can be taken to alleviate these negative effects. First, the advancement of innovative technology facilitates the utilization of alternative energy, which is less detrimental for plants and animals, compared to fossil fuel, thanks to lower amount of released harmful gases. Second, policies are also of great use in preventing species from destruction, as we see in Canada, which saw a considerable decline in number of seal hunters after the seal clothes prohibition in Europe came into effect.
In brief, when not disavowing that the impacts upon plants and animals are unavoidable, I believe that human activities can be modified to minimize them and assure sustainable lives for all species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-13 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate.What are the causes of this situation? What are the solutions? 67
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes. However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The two maps show an island, before and after the construction for a tourism purpose.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The bar chart below The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000.Summarise the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sure sustainable lives for all species.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, in brief, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62629757785 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17690402694 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674740484429 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.529055188 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.818181818 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21210754889 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784768463148 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757976383427 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135415283732 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578806839519 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.