Nowadays, successful sports professionals can make a huge role in the country. Some people justify that popular sportspersons can earn more money than crucial professions people while others do not. This essay will discuss both sides in detail and provide evidence as to why it is fair.
To achieve great success in sports is not easy. Although, there are a lot of sports professionals why everyone does not become successful. However, in successful sports professionals, some extra factors are there. For example, every sportsperson does hard work but some of them do it in high intensity even if it is in practice sessions like the Indian captain Virat Kohli. He achieves a lot of success in sports around the world. Overall, successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions because of their extra efforts and passions.
Secondly, sportspersons have to do some sacrifices. Furthermore, in some sports games, sports professionals have to go to a foreign country so they are far away from their families and friends. In addition, sometimes they do not allow to attending any personal events in the family when they are on their duties. For instance, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the former Indian captain had not seen his daughter face for almost 8 months after she was born. In short, they deserve to make a great deal and earn more money because of their sacrifices.
To sum up, it is fair enough if sports professionals make better money than important professions people because of their hard-working attitude and sacrifices.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86330332259 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6772399337 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341529047006 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119216355789 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11983896456 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229076574865 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110578287054 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.