Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer tuitions. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It has been a controversial question whether the government of richer nations should be more responsible helping the poorer tuitions in health, education, and trades due to their importance for the development of a nation. As for me, there is no reason to denounce this opinion.
There is no concern that helping the impoverished countries in such areas is the richer governments’ responsibilities. Firstly, helping those poorer countries is not only seem like a good thing to do but it also a good opportunity to invest on. In short terms, it is a “win-win” co-operation. The richer country can raise a country’s development by investing in its health and educational services and in return, they can financially benefit from the investment. For examples, the are many international colleges and universities around Vietnam like BUV, RMIT, ITI, … and the investors can benefit from the students’ loans. Another reason why richer country should help poorer countries that is to improve the friendship between countries around the world, rich countries help poor countries, and the poor countries help the pourers. As a result, it will raise a commonwealth between countries. Many organizations and commonwealths have been so successful in this, like ASEAN and EU.
Finally, it’s all about the human’s rights. It declared that everyone around the globe have the rights to have a proper health services, education and living conditions. And since trading is one of the economic spearheads of many countries, it indirectly improves the people’s living conditions and services in a country. Yet many citizens living in such poor countries can not access to those services. And the rich nations, since they have done so well for their people’s conditions living and other essential services, should take more responsibility to help those poor nations’ people, with a view to having the people’s equality around the world.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that richer nations should help the poorer countries in order to raise their development as it not only benefits the countries’ government but also the people and the helping countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-13 | namphong020 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Task 1 The table shows the rate of women participating in high ranking excutive in three companies from 1975 to 2015 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...efit from the investment. For examples, the are many international colleges and univers...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, so, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33236151603 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07897394901 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492711370262 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6762894811 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307143157428 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935673817948 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111150903387 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230087290157 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11030528669 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.