Seeking for reasons why job-hopping is more commonly seen today, the answer can be various. From my perspective, it is obviously more beneficial to employees, nor organizations.
Admittedly, many people change jobs because of looking for other opportunities in their careers, or changing career directions. So that, they are able to learn new skills, meet new people, also to challenge themselves. Besides, people who change work frequently have a better evaluation on their own market values, since they are always in the market, from which, they can easily identify their merits and demerits for further development. Moreover, financial issue is also a desirable factor to many people. It is reasonable if people hunting for high-wage job positions to gain a better living quality.
Although people obtaining a range of benefits from job-hopping, its drawback by losing skilled and well-trained employees for organizations is clear. Also, if people changing works extremely frequent, will be seen as less loyal to employers. Emphasized in many organization cultures, loyalty is essential to evaluate responsibility of employees, which is also a basic trait in personality.
In conclusion, choosing a different career path gives more opportunities to working class. More importantly, organizations should improve working environment and provide job promotions to meet staff job satisfaction, so that to keep their wanted employees.
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Each year crime committed by young people is on the rise What are the reasons Suggest some solutions 56
- An increasing number of people are changing their careers What are the reasons Do you think this is a positive or negative development to society 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, moreover, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68518518519 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20219135788 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.675925925926 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4653453484 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133801219129 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495824819167 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536984142667 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702385817496 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514074056012 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, moreover, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68518518519 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20219135788 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.675925925926 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4653453484 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133801219129 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495824819167 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536984142667 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702385817496 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514074056012 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.