Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Recently, traffic jam and air pollution are huge problems in big cities which require more attention of goverment and individual to solve. Some people are in alarm that increasing the price of petrol is the most optimal way to deal with the problem of crowed traffic and environmental problems. Personally, I agree with this opinion because of some reasons.
On the one hand, an optimal way to reduce traffic congestion and pollution is rising the petroleum price. Firstly, this method will affect directly resident's budget which make them consider carefully before using their vehicle to travel. This may lead to the possibility that the current frequency of using private vehicles would be lower than that in the past. And as a result, the number of vehicle on road would be reduced and air pollution also then would be decreased. Secondly, high petroleum price may make people think to use public transport or others which use alternative sources such as electricity or hydric power. Reducing the consumption of petrol lead to decreasing of carbon dioxide emission released from car and motobike. Hence, pollution would be declined.
On the other hand, there are some other solutions which are effective in helping tackle traffic congestion and pollution. The first one is extending road which is helpful in dealing with traffic jam in rush hours. The second method is improving public transport system in big city. The reason people use their vehicle to go out is that they don't have to waste time to wait bus. Then, if the schedule of bus line is more frequent and effective, more people will use bus instead of private vehicles. And clearly, the number of car and motobike and emissions from transport would be reduced. Lastly, it's also necessary for goverment to reduce immigration into big cities by creating more jobs, constructing more factory, building office in rural area. Then, the numer of people to traveling long distance to reach workplace would be fell.
In conclusion, while I agree that traffic and air pollution would be solved by increasing the price of petrol, there are also several other measures which should be considered and adapted to help reducing the number of vehicles on road and emissions from private transport
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-22 | lilyngan | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | Hoang Mung | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is dissappearing What are the reason and what are the impacts 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the cause of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng public transport system in big city. The reason people use their vehicle to go o...
^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...se their vehicle to go out is that they dont have to waste time to wait bus. Then, i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd motobike and emissions from transport would be reduced. Lastly, its also neces...
^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...hould be considered and adapted to help reducing the number of vehicles on road and emis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05376344086 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55246712996 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3803604759 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9473684211 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177752459675 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580120111161 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582170775072 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136069424369 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554899202886 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.