Today, cars are the most common way to move to the place you want. A lot of people nowadays have one or more cars. Some people prefer to get a taxi, or go by bus or subway. But all these vehicles move because of petrol. Every day traffic and pollution is growing and many people look for a way to decrease this problems.
There is an idea that increasing the price of petrol will solve the problems transports make. But I think this is a very bad idea to solve this problem. At first, the petrol consists of oil in common. We can’t just increase the price of the petrol, we need to increase the price of the oil, because increasing the prices of petrol without a reason will lead to public discontent. Secondly, It will be bad idea, because except cars, buses etc., we also have planes, agriculture machinery, special vehicles, trucks, military equipment, water transport and it also need petrol.
I think the best way to solve the problem, it’s to increase the tax on cars. It will be a good solution, because it won't affect other vehicles.
Also the good solution is to ban old cars or cars with dirty traffic fumes. There is the law like this in Japan. With every year the tax, based on the car's age, is growing. And if the car is very old, the tax is very high, and the owner couldn't pay the bills on his car. But this still isn’t the best way I think. Because there are a lot of car lovers, who love old cars like me. And they look after their cars very carefully.
So, I think the most effective way to solve the problem is to ban cars with the dirty traffic fumes at all. Government should set the law with very strong requirements to car’s fumes.
Overall, there are a lot of ways to solve the problem of pollution and high traffic. But in most countries it’s still high. The most bad way to solve this problem is to increase prices of petrol. And I think the most effective way is to increase the taxes on daily cars and set the strong control on car’s fumes.
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Other, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- The charts show information about the number of UK university students and government spending and types of student's family economic background in 1991. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... many people look for a way to decrease this problems. There is an idea that increa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
... equipment, water transport and it also need petrol. I think the best way to solve...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...because it wont affect other vehicles. Also the good solution is to ban old cars or...
^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ld, the tax is very high, and the owner couldnt pay the bills on his car. But this stil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34408602151 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20082337781 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456989247312 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7086346956 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.64 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.88 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.56 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313474198241 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10126412083 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104997555586 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17374856304 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645117491874 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.5 13.0946893788 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 50.2224549098 165% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 11.3001002004 46% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.3 12.4159519038 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.