In this day and age, there has been a growing concern about transportation and contamination issues. While some individuals believe that fuel price should rise up to tackle the dilemma, I disagree with this opinion. In this essay, I would give my point of view and recommend some effective solution.
Apparently, it would be counterproductive to consider increasing the petrol price as the most beneficial way to handle the growing traffic and polluted environment problems. Although this method could restrict the use of cars and motorbikes, which are thought to be one of the most harmful factors to the pollution as they emit exhaust fumes to the environment, it might create an unnecessary power burden on public transport such as buses, trains. The higher petrol price, the higher fee for public transports. As a result, there will be a number of people who are unlikely to use these public transport as their methods of travelling.
In fact, there are several ways to deal with the traffic issues. It is highly recommended that government should invest in public transport to make it more convenient in order to encourage people to use them instead of other vehicles. To clarify, the authority should build more train or bus stations so that people can easily walk to these stations. Another factor which should also be taken into account is to decrease the price of public transport. As a consequence, people can use public transport as their comfortable means of transport and air pollution as well as traffic congestion would drop dramatically.
All in all, in my standpoint, rising up the cost of gasoline is not a really wise idea to deal with aforementioned problems because it might boost the price of public transport. Therefore, to solve traffic problems, government should spend money on public transport to not only increase its convenience but also encourage people to use them
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow the children to do what they want.Is this a good way to raise children 84
- Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified worker such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- many people go to university for academic study. more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. to what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'These means'?
Suggestion: This means; These means
...pular for most people around the world. These means of transport may be considered to be on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cars or bikes. To clarify, the authority should build more train or bus stations ...
^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, to solve traffic problems, government should spend money on public transport t...
^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port to increase its term of convenience and encourage people to use them
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75415355038 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492163009404 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4410728637 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139036941141 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549546463154 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374129034199 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096492203927 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205315843603 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.