Fuel price is one of the significant numbers for the people who own a car. Even though increasing prices of petrol might result in slight decrease of growing traffic and pollution problems, such method is not nearly the best.
Although increasing petrol price may strict some drivers on how much they drive a vehicle, overwhelming majority of them will still be driving a car in the same amount of time. The reason for this is that if people have already bought a car and it is quite convenient for them to use it, then they probably will not restrict themselves on usage of the vehicle. Take for example people that have unreliable public transport, but have work distance from their home. It is clear that these people will use cars, it was more expensive fuel. Consequently so I could conjunctions and environmental pollution by exhaust fumes will not alter significantly. Moreover, more expensive petrol would mean that people will try to store more petrol for the future. The possible further increase of the fuel price is the reason. As a result, traffic will be worsened in the first few days and only boost pollution problems.
On the other hand, there a variety of solutions that are more effective than simple increase of petrol price. Enhancing public transport and encouraging people to use it is a noticeably more reliable measure, even if it is less straightforward. For instance, decreasing price for public transport and improving quality of rides by adding special line for buses and other public transports. Consequently, traffic and pollution problems would weaken their grip.
To conclude, increasing fuel price is not the best option for encountering traffic and pollution issues, but improving public transport facilities and substitutes for own car will help.
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these couses affected three regions of the world during the 1990 couses of land degradation by region? 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...l use cars, it was more expensive fuel. Consequently so I could conjunctions and environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mproving public transport facilities and substitutes for own car will help.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77079598309 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554421768707 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8598689289 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159261311606 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658453222439 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666128084153 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124531079882 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445961573416 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.