Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that government and big business have a critical role to play in improving the environment. While some argue that individuals are therefore powerless to help combat environmental degradation, I completely disagree with this view.
On the one hand, both governments and large enterprises can and should take steps to prevent an ecological crisis. From a government perspective, policies must be enacted and enforced internationally. These must cover a wide range of issues, such as the protection of endangered species, a halt to habitat destruction, and funding research into alternative energy sources, to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. In terms of corporate responsibility, producers should not discharge toxic chemical waste into rivers or the sea and they must cut down on emissions from factories to fight climate change. They should also aim to achieve sustainable development by not depleting natural resources, for example by deforestation.
On the other hand, there are many actions that individuals can take to care for the environment. These include changing patterns of consumption. For instance, products which are environmentally friendly, such as green detergent brands, are widely available in the shops, so that it is easy to change buying habits. Buying local products is another option, reducing food miles. A different type of action is to join one of the organisations in the green movement, like Greepeace. Individuals can help these groups to raise funds to protect plants and animals on the brink of extinction and to strengthen campaigns for government interventions and initiatives.
In conclusion, while governments and corporations carry a great responsibility for alleviating environmental problems, individuals have a signficant role to play. I therefore totally disagree that individuals are powerless to contribute towards saving the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | educator0402 | 89 | view |
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution. Do you agree? 56
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academicresults, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academicresults, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution Do you agree 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.606271777 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32221880046 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627177700348 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5947064232 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168980869035 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546413976768 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539558614696 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105244508437 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301250782713 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.