The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a public concern that global society must have measure instantly to secure all nations to curb the amount of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. While this issue is burdensome to some extent, I strongly side with it. These would be elaborated below.
Firstly, non-renewable resources would be extinct in the near future. Specifically, unlike sunlight and solar power, fossil fuels are a finite energy resource. The amount of fossil fuels in the Earth today are result of several hundred million years which a significant amount of organic matter have long been decaying and decomposing. This means that, people would be unable to use their cars any more as we have not found an alternative energy source which works equivalently efficiently as petroleum. Consequently, the price of fossil fuels is also anticipated to increase, leading to a fuel war among the first-world countries. If all countries don't cut down their consumption of fossil fuels immediately, negative consequences would impact on the development of the entire countries in the world due to the disappearance of several important energy resources.
Secondly, it is undoubted that the main drawback of using non-renewable energy are destroying our Earth. Particularly, it is exploiting non-renewable energy at a higher speed that causes ozone depletion as well as global warming because burning of oil and coal have long been discharging tonnes of greenhouse gas per year. In fact, scientists point to a steady rise with a stronger period in the 70s in the 90s and a return to the rising pattern in the 2000s. Admittedly, it is true that the government in several nations have imposed high tax on gasoline to limit the use of private means of transportation such as cars, in turn curb fossil fuels rate. However, making kind of energy is still dangerous to the general health of our planet.
In conclusion, it is true that fossil fuels are a finite energy resource. I also completely convinced with the fact that the main disadvantage of using non-renewable energy have long been destroying our environment. Therefore, reducing amount of fossil fuels would be considered instantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-07 | TrinhDuyHung | 73 | view |
- In many parts of world, children have been allowed to have certain work and got paid. Although, salaried jobs may have some benefits, I do not agree with this trend.Clearly, there are several benefits that a paid work can provide for school-age children. 61
- The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ld be unable to use their cars any more as we have not found an alternative energy...
^^
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...first-world countries. If all countries dont cut down their consumption of fossil fu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11331444759 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95437407996 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546742209632 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8749840343 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171547369776 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563160359365 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596291019129 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1171540103 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451385011857 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.