International tourism has been a big industry. Some people think it creates tension rather than bringing people of different countries close together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Travelling across national borders is one of the major dimensions of the industrial revolution. Following this, many people raise the question of whether in lieu of strengthening social and global close-knit, this trend imposes immense burdens on various aspects of lives. Although international relationships have been created and consolidated, I wholeheartedly agree with the mentioned argument.
There is a conspicuous reason why people believe that the circumstances in which global tourism builds up international correlations are the most significant . They often argue that exposure to distinctive cultures and environment are the driving force behind this trend. By travelling abroad, opportunities to explore new traditions and acknowledge different sequences of habits are inevitable which create invisible connections between entities from unique backgrounds. In addition, foreign travellers will have a chance to familiarise with numerous culinary food which are the symbol of a unique country.
On the contrary, burdensome situations are more noteworthily concerned. First and foremost, the environmental conditions are adversely influenced by the arrival of hordes of tourists since they are associated with an extreme amount of waste, especially which are hard to decompose. Consequently, tons of rubbish are treated by heat and hazardous chemicals or buried in landfill sites which simultaneously impact the water, soil and air.Deterioration in the number of entomophagous creatures are frequently cited to exemplify since they rely on insects fed on leaves. Consistently important, domestic culture and finance have suffered from undesirable conditions. Because of demands of higher facilities to adapt visitors' luxurious requirements, local residents have to face financial tension and strive for preserving culture with a sense of identity.
To put things in a nutshell, it is evident and arguable to claim that instead of bringing people together, international tourism has massive impacts on several parts of lives, namely the environment and domestic traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...tion. Following this, many people raise the question of whether in lieu of strengthening social and glo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...al correlations are the most significant . They often argue that exposure to disti...
^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Deterioration
...aneously impact the water, soil and air.Deterioration in the number of entomophagous creature...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he environment and domestic traditions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, then, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94352159468 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32590139727 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667774086379 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8294093824 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.615384615 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134314365047 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413164769708 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490043278519 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871220111167 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497613027355 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.