In this day and age, traveling abroad is becoming a prevalent type in the tourism industry. While it is acknowledged that foreign travelers can have detrimental impacts on the countries they visit, I am convinced that they pale in comparison with certain advantages that the host countries received.
On the one hand, tourists can have detrimental effects on countries for the two main resonales. Firstly, the influx of tourists traveling annually results in environmental harm. The increasing number of vehicles on roads contributes to air and noise pollution, leading to severe deterioration issues in several countries. Furthermore, popular tourist spots such as museums are easily able to get degrade when frequented by large numbers of visitors. Preserving the historical site is possible with a smaller number of people visiting those locations.
On the other hand, notwithstanding the aforementioned drawbacks, I would contend that the advantages provided by oversea tourists are by far weightier. First and foremost, it not only boosts the country's revenue but also address unemployment by creating massive job opportunities in the service industries such as drivers, waiter, interpreters, and so on. Secondly, international tourism could foster a deeper understanding of visited countries and strengthen global relationships, enriching visitors’ experiences exploring diverse cultures, and promoting these countries positively.
In conclusion, while it is true that overseas tourists can do harm to the environment and historical sites, I believe that they are vastly eclipsed by the benefits that international tourism brings to such countries by boosting the economy and advertising their identity culture.
- The life cycle of a salmon
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country that they visited Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country that they visited Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The process below shows the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon
- The process below shows the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79133858268 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26539382397 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649606299213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5233840552 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.727272727 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250449694977 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789525419337 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783022104086 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14753222592 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875094362295 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.