The internet is the best place to find information. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The internet has gained unimaginable level of popularity over the recent years. Thus, there is a claim that it is the most optimal source of information. I, personally, concur with the statment.
As for the advantages of the internet over conventional sources of information, we could emphasize its convinience. Not only is web more time-efficient, but also provides a range of the most up-to-date information. In other words, any sort of news can be found within seconds by a click of a button. On top of that, the disabled, the blind as well as paralyzed in particular, will definitely find it handy due to its installed voice assisrant such as Siri. Last but not least, the internet is regarded as the cheapest source of information almost in all countries of the world.
Turning to the traditional sources, we could point out downsides of theirs by using information's kin - news, as an example. Firstly, TV broadcasts news at fixed time, which may trigger nuisance to some. Radio, in turn, broadcasts news irrespective to our wishes. For instance, whenever I listen to the radio while driving, there is news irrelevant for me, thus I tend to switch on the net and listen to podcasts on desirable topics. Finally, newspapers are, out of the questions, inferior to the internet. For, when there is a chance to acces news both audibly and visually, only few opt for reading.
To sum up everything that has been stated so far, the internet is, as for me, by far the best source of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, may, second, so, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in particular, sort of, such as, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84435797665 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92437429652 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9446608467 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884977305543 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028246811084 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335117880917 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564213391636 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229283227108 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.