Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recruiting new emploees is a long and challenging procces. Some individulas bekieve that interviews are unrelaiable method selecting a new employer and there are better various method. However, most large companies still still use interviews method selecting their employees. I completely disagree with that interview is not reliable method than others, whereas others methods are equally good even though it depends on recruiters choose to select their employees.
There are two main reasons why interview is chosen to their employee. Firstly, employe get an idea about employee’s personality and social skills. In the interview, employee is faced to face to face interaction and has to answer an impromptu question. Secondly, recruiters ask case study question. By this question, they understand how to tackle a situation under presoure, show much confidence and think out of the box. Some such incidents don’t get from other methods.
Interview is not such only method, there are many method to select employee. Group discussion is one of them. By the group discussion, it is known about conversation skill which is very important for sales job. If they need to judge theoritical knowledge they can pursuit written exam. By combition three methods would be better to choice an employee.
It is not true that individual methodis always good. They have some shortcomings. In interview method, recruit bias to emploee. In written exam, doesn’t qualify person’s knowledge and expertise on specific topic. But combition by this three method it will best for selecting and employee.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that interview method is not unreliable method than other methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-14 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant 67
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recruiting new emploees is a long and challenging procces. Some individula...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: still
...s method. However, most large companies still still use interviews method selecting their e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...views method selecting their employees. I completely disagree with that interview...
^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...ls. In the interview, employee is faced to face to face interaction and has to answer an improm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'there are many methods'?
Suggestion: there are many methods
.... Interview is not such only method, there are many method to select employee. Group discussion is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'many methods'.
Suggestion: many methods
...view is not such only method, there are many method to select employee. Group discussion is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...lecting and employee. In conclusion, I strongly believe that interview method ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47908745247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81876532993 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8134496328 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.619047619 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5238095238 20.7667163134 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356572017037 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968993832311 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10370023987 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201575581507 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978542136208 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.