It is believed that people should work for the same organization during their work lives. Others believed that people should work for different organizations. Discuss both sides.
In recent year, there are a growing number of people who hold a belief that the individuals should work for the same company throughout their life rather than changing their jobs regularly. This essay will discuss both view and draw out my perspective.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why they hold this opinion, and I would explore a few of the most important ones here. Firstly, it may well come as no surprise that working in one workplace for a long time enables people become master in this field. It is said that practice makes perfect; thus, the employees can gain knowledge to improve themselves day by day although they used to be a newbie at first. Secondly, it seems appropriate that the individuals working in the same organization will easily get benefits than others. As a result, they have more and more opportunities to guarantee their lives by taking advantages from their occupations such as getting promoted as well as high salary.
On the other hand, that is only part of this explanation. Perhaps the most remarkable about keeping changing their jobs is not really a detrimental options. One reason for this is that always seeking a new job makes people become more and more active than ever. The will experience something interesting or leaning a new skills that they have not done before involved in English or communication skills because nowadays there are many companies require their employees with high quality. In addition, it is also true since the individuals working in a new environment can easily make friends with other staffs through working together. Consequently, they will have a large circle of friends, which helps them if they are getting in any serious troubles.
To sum up, it is by no means an easy task for every one to determine which sides they should take because both sides appear to prove their points. However, I still personal believes that people should contribute their abilities for the same organization instead of finding a new job because it is not simply a company or a workplace if they have been working for a long time, it is their family
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-06 | nghinguyen56 | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | nghinguyen56 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- bar chart 11
- It is believed that people should work for the same organization during their work lives. Others believed that people should work for different organizations. Discuss both sides. 67
- It is believed that people should work for the same organization during their work lives. Others believed that people should work for different organizations. Discuss both sides. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
... something interesting or leaning a new skills that they have not done before involved...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8347107438 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6074696684 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548209366391 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.156231292 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305743038203 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968562822727 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102049957955 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214062327134 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865261580441 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.