It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whether being born in natural talents or training is more important in sport or music remains controversial. Some people think that there are some children who are born with certain talents while others argue that children can study hard daily to have professional skills in sport or music. In this essay, I will discuss both opinions and provide my view on this problem.
First, there is no doubt that education systems are based on the belief that all children can study effectively to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport and music. That explains why all schools have guide practice and teaching classes, and parents send their kids to music classes or sports clubs at a very young age.
However, some people claim that being good at sport or music cannot be obtained by training, no matter how good the teachers or how frequently a child practices. They maintain that if sport and music skills can be studied by only training, all people in the world will be able to play sport or an instrument professionally. Besides, according to a survey, there are only one over ten people who can play an instrument such as piano or guitar although they have tried to study for at least five years.
I, personally, think that one person will succeed if she or he is laborious and persistence. On the other hand, talents can give individuals a facility for specific skills that allow them to excel, while more hard-working people never manage to reach a comparable level. However, as will all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not manually exclusive. Good musicians or exceptional sports stars have probably succeeded because of both natural talents and functional training. Without talents, training would be neither effective or productive; and also with training, children can not know how to develop their talents.
To sum up, I agree that children can be taught particular skills, but to be professional in some areas like sport or music, they need some natural talents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Esther Katlyn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | morbymuku | 92 | view |
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an England town in 2012. 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss bot view and give your 84
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002. It includes those with a degree, whose with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other qualifications. 67
- The money spent on research has brought enormous benefits to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree? 78
Comments
'On the other hand' means
'On the other hand' means 'However'. It doesn't mean 'On another hand'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not manually exclusive. Good mu...
^^
Line 7, column 540, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...ts, training would be neither effective or productive; and also with training, chi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, while, at least, no doubt, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00595238095 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60117685515 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550595238095 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.545673407 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368501142144 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120876390463 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678139017694 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204014919404 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551805042871 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.