The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant.
The pie chart depicts the proposition of water using over the world, while the bar chart gives figures of water use in different parts of the world in 2000. Both diagrams show the percentage of three categories: agriculture, domestic and industry with the unit of those patterns is percent (%).
Overall, almost, with 70%, water consumption of the world was used for agriculture, while there was about one-quarter was spent on industry and 8% for domestic purpose. Besides, the data show that water use in the two developing countries, China and India, is closer to the world pattern of consumption.
To be more precise, the word pattern is almost identical to that for China with only 1% less in the agriculture part and 1% more in the domestic activities, whereas India used more water (92%) for agriculture and the rest for both domestic and industry sections. In contrast, New Zealand used almost the same amount of water, nearly 45% for each, in cultivation and household use, and a slightly higher 10% was consumed by industry.
The pattern in Canada is almost reverse that of the world, with only the smallest proposition (8%) of water use is spent in agriculture and a massive 80% by industry. Besides, only 12% was used by the domestic sector, which was a quarter of New Zealand industrial consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-18 | VuXuan | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | VuXuan | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | Gurpreet sidhu | 67 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 69
- University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91891891892 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70318424296 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9089414684 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15545103175 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819265855671 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557899717892 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113229513136 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274550143887 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.