It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether some people are gifted with certain talents that they do not have to learn or challenge much to become successful, or that is possible to acquire achievements through the conventional of methods of practicing and training work to be a good sports player or musician. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and give my partial support latter view.
On the one side of the argument, people are born with certain talents such as an extremely intelligent brain to play musical instruments or an incredibly strong body in order to play sports. If children have those talents, they can do what they want faster and easier than others without learning too much and will reach the highest level. Mozart, as an example, he is a very famous composer when he was six years of old in handwriting. With the help of his father, he not only became a brilliant compose but also horned as a skillful piano player.
On the other hand, everyone can be taught to become a talent person. Children who learned to play instruments such as piano and violin when they are a child totally can be a good musician. Or someone would like to be a bodybuilder, swimmer or athlete may have to train for a long time completely turn into professors. This is a reason in my country, we have University of Sport and Conservatoire to help students to be professional in sports or art. Furthermore, modern science and research can analyze the criteria and the factors that lead to success are taking time to be trained and challenged. Thus, it is totally credible and realistic.
In conclusion, both arguments have their merits. However, I strongly believe that people who do not have certain talents but they take time to train and work hard can be perfectly successful in life and certainly get the same level as people who gifted with expertises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Esther Katlyn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | morbymuku | 92 | view |
- task 1 11
- The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair. 73
- The bar chart illustrates how much time men and women spending their time to do housework per day in the United Kingdom 61
- today, the highest sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold to what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...rn more to be a famous musician or good sports player. However, others including me st...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...o be sports players and musicians. in conclusion, I strongly believe that peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59479553903 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52485057801 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2306956201 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293522334051 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119994775374 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528253492034 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183020668083 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635816489964 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.